By RANDY WHITE, D.Min.
Founder and CEO
I am establishing Dispensational Publishing House to become the “go-to” source for strong, Bible-based, theological, doctrinal and worldview resources from the dispensational perspective.
While dispensational theology once had a very strong presence in the United States, today it is often looked upon with disdain and contempt in many evangelical—and most scholarly—circles. However, much of what has been written about dispensationalism is flawed in its assumptions. At DPH, our desire is to adequately present Biblical matters from a sound dispensational perspective. In so doing, we hope to correct some of the misconceptions regarding dispensationalism that exist in the current theological climate.
When the average believer goes to a Christian bookstore, it is almost impossible for him to know, up front, the theological perspective from which an author or publisher begins. After reading 100 pages or more, the reader may discover that he is not convinced of the soundness of the writer’s assumptions. At DPH, we want the reader to know the assumptions up front.
Every resource at DPH, whether on our blog or one of our printed materials, will hold to these distinctives:
- A conviction of verbal plenary inspiration. We believe God gave words, not ideas. Our ideas (theological, sociological, psychological, etc.) must conform to the words God inspired. I personally believe that the King James Version of the Bible is the closest literal English translation, and have therefore recently switched back to preaching and teaching from this beloved text. However, since we believe the original autographs are inerrant, we also strive to understand and translate Hebrew and Greek.
- A conviction that God revealed His Word in stages, or dispensations. We believe that men can only be saved by the grace of God, but that God revealed His grace progressively through the different dispensations. Although all Scripture is inspired and is to be profited from, we do not believe that Christians today are required—or even able—to adhere to all aspects of that revelation on an equal basis. Instead, we believe that later revelation sheds light on earlier revelation, and that believers are to receive instruction for daily living from portions of the New Testament which speak to the church age.
- A conviction that the church will be raptured prior to the coming tribulation. We believe that the church age must come to a conclusion before “the time of Jacob’s trouble” (Jer. 30:7; i.e., the tribulation) can commence. Therefore, the church must, by theological necessity, be raptured, bringing this dispensation to a close.
- A conviction of a coming millennial, earthly kingdom. We believe that Jesus Christ will establish the kingdom of God in the future, on earth—physically reigning from the throne of David in Jerusalem. This will be a time in which the purposes of creation will be fulfilled in the Jewish Messiah, who is the Second Adam. When we refer to the kingdom of God, it is a reference to a coming, future, physical kingdom.
- A conviction that the Bible, in 66 books, is complete and sufficient. We believe that we hear from God through the pages of Scripture. Therefore, we do not advocate “hearing from God” through any other means. While preaching proclaims the Word, and others often confirm our understanding of the Word, only the Bible is the Word of God.
- A conviction that the words of the Bible can be taken literally. We believe that, unless the context demands otherwise, the Bible should be interpreted literally.
Welcome to Dispensational Publishing House! We hope to become long-term friends with you, your family and your church.
If you have a particular need or publishing request, contact our editor in chief, Paul Scharf, today.
Copyright © 2015 Dispensational Publishing House, Inc.
Scripture taken from the King James Version.
A very valuable contribution to the publishing world! Congratulations, and strength for the journey.
Thank you, Jim. I would love to publish some of your works someday!
I totally agree with everything here except for the KJV being the ” personally believe that the King James Version of the Bible is the closest literal English translation”….this Iif I may say Dr. White needs to be re-thought…………many words, as you probably know, in the KJV have changed meaning over the last 300+ years since it was penned………….what about the NASB? I think the source ( Textus Receptus …KJV) may not be as accurate as the methodology/sources the Lockman Foundation used to compile the NASB……..the NASB seemed to consider more earlier manuscripts than the KJV……what say you Randy?
Hi Richard. For years I used NASB. The NASB uses the Critical Text, just as all the other modern translations. I prefer the Textus Receptus. I think the “earlier manuscript” dogma needs to be re-questioned. I would want to know why one early manuscript trumps hundreds of other manuscripts. Is it inherently better? Couldn’t an earlier scribe have made a mistake? I think there have to be a lot of hard questions asked. I’m not a KJV only guy, but I do think KJV has also been more literal than the NASB…though NASB is the most literal of the modern translations.
I understand your points here Randy……..I’m not at all trying to be confrontational and I fully support what you are doing here!
RR
I love it when people question the assumptions. Thanks for “poking and prodding”–we need more of that in the Christian world.
I’m excited about this Bro Randy. I’m standing with you and will financially support as I can.
God bless you, Carlys. Thank you for your constant encouragement and wonderful ministry.
I will be honest—I am not 100% in the “dispensational camp.” Yet there are many verses in Scripture which are puzzling to me (for example Romans 4:1-6 versus James 2: 14-26), and I would be interested in exploring how dispensational theology treats a lot of “hard verses.” Is there any chance you will be publishing a verse-by-verse commentary on the Bible that deals with the “hard” verses from a dispensational perspective?
We love those who are not fully convinced..they make good Bereans! I have found that a dispensational perspective is so helpful in handling these “hard verses.” And one of my personal projects is a commentary on books of the Bible, taken dispensationally. –but that may be a while! In the mean time, you might benefit from the first two sessions of my teaching on “Understanding Dispensations,” which you can find here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSKN1RQsCpUhNNOzEBVcDNvp-QJf66f6M
Dispensational whole Bible COMMENTARIES that deal with hard passages:
The Bible Knowledge Commentary (DTS scholars) by Walvoord & Zuck
Believer’s Bible Commentary (brethren, devotional, great value) by MacDonald & Farstad
The Complete Bible Commentary (old but good) by George Williams
The Grace New Testament Commentary (newest, free grace) by GES
Thank you Preacher for all that you do. I’ve been a student of The Word for 25 plus years now and since my recent discovery of your ministry my understanding is rising to a higher level, which is greatly enhancing my personal study and preparation for teaching. This dispensational hermeneutic helps tremendously in clearing up difficult and sometimes troubling passages, along with your persistent advice to ” question the assumptions “..I’ve put this new site on my favorites bar and am looking forward to frequent visits.
Will the club 8 and 360 help in this endeavor or is this separate?
God bless you, Bob! What a wonderful encouragement and testimony.
While DPH and Randy White Ministries are separate organizations, RWM is where financial support comes from. So, yes, Club 8 and 360 do help.